Dominance and Submission Beyond the Bedroom
Dominance and submission may be popularly associated with sexual expression, but these dynamics are far more pervasive and subtle than we often acknowledge. Whether it’s who plans the vacation, who sets the tone in a workplace meeting, or who keeps the peace at the dinner table, negotiated power exchanges can quietly govern many aspects of our daily lives. These roles are often rooted in our personalities, past experiences, and even attachment styles. Far from being inherently erotic, dominance and submission are often about structure, trust, and clarity; a dance of control and surrender that extends beyond intimacy and into the ordinary routines of life.
Power and Partnership: Who Leads, Who Follows?
In romantic relationships, everyday dominance and submission can appear in decisions about finances, parenting, scheduling, or household roles. These dynamics aren’t always overtly negotiated, but they influence how conflict is managed and how emotional labour is distributed. When partners consciously acknowledge and discuss their preferences, like one being more directive and the other more receptive; these roles can lead to harmony rather than resentment.
For example, someone with a more submissive orientation might feel at ease deferring to a dominant partner’s lead in planning and problem-solving, while feeling emotionally safe and cared for. It’s not always about control; it’s about trust. This mutual trust and understanding, when based on consent and not obligation, mirrors the psychological safety found in sexual dominance and submission (Nichols, 2006).
Attachment Styles and Love Languages
Attachment theory offers valuable insight into how we approach emotional closeness, authority, and care across all types of relationships. Anxiously attached individuals often seek reassurance and may adopt more submissive roles to maintain connection. In contrast, avoidantly attached individuals tend to value independence and may express dominance or emotional distance to protect themselves (Fraley & Shaver, 2000).
These patterns begin early in life. A child conditioned to appease a demanding parent may grow into an adult who avoids conflict and assumes caregiving roles in relationships. Conversely, a sibling accustomed to leading or managing family dynamics might develop strong directive tendencies. These learned power dynamics often carry into friendships, romantic relationships, and even workplace behaviours.
Love languages add another dimension. Someone who thrives on “acts of service” may naturally gravitate toward a supportive or deferential role, while someone whose primary language is “words of affirmation” may take on an emotionally guiding or validating role. As Chapman (2015) notes, love languages are more than preferences; they reflect the emotional frameworks through which we experience power, trust, and connection.
Together, attachment styles and love languages shape how we give and receive care, navigate power, and establish emotional boundaries. These dynamics and patterns allows us to engage in more intentional, balanced, and respectful relationships across personal and professional spheres.
Dominance and Deference at Work
In the workplace, dominance and submission-like dynamics manifest through leadership styles, hierarchy, and team behaviour. While not sexual, the parallels are striking. Dominant figures often take on assertive, decision-making roles. Submissive figures may find fulfillment in supporting roles, excelling in execution and follow-through. Notably, healthy workplaces foster consensual power structures: job roles are clear, boundaries are respected, and leadership is earned, not imposed. But when power is abused or submissive tendencies are exploited, such as when emotional labour is unevenly distributed or credit is withheld then, tension builds. This mirrors the importance of consent and aftercare in erotic dominance and submission play. Just as in kink, trust and clarity make the difference between empowerment and exploitation (Harviainen & Frank, 2016).
Job Security and Power Dynamics... Click to read more!
When Submission Becomes Emotional Labour
One of the least acknowledged parallels between erotic submission and everyday life is emotional labour. Many individuals, particularly women and marginalized people find themselves in habitual caregiving roles, expected to manage others’ emotions, schedules, and comfort. When these roles are not consensually chosen, they can feel like burdens rather than expressions of love.
However, when partners or coworkers engage in open dialogue about emotional needs and boundaries, these acts of care can be transformed into chosen contributions rather than unspoken obligations. The key lies in consent, reciprocity, and recognition. Just as a submissive in a BDSM relationship may feel empowered by clearly defined expectations, someone in a caretaking role can feel valued when their efforts are seen and appreciated.
Power Dynamics Across Cultures and Families
Cultural norms deeply shape how dominance and submission appear in daily relationships. In collectivist societies such as those in East Asia, parts of Africa, and Latin America, hierarchical roles are often reinforced through tradition and social expectations. Children are taught to respect elders, and deference is seen as a virtue, not a weakness. Submission often aligns with values like harmony, obedience, and duty. In contrast, individualistic cultures like those in North America and Western Europe emphasize autonomy and equality. While these societies promote fluidity in roles, subtle power imbalances often persist due to factors like gender, race, or class. Even when outward hierarchies are challenged, internalized beliefs about authority can still guide behaviour and relationship dynamics. Across these cultural contexts, the meaning of dominance and submission shifts; sometimes signaling respect and social order, other times reinforcing hidden inequality or control.
Within families, power roles are often learned early and become emotionally ingrained. Anxious children may adopt submissive behaviors to gain approval or maintain closeness, while avoidant children may assert control as a defense against emotional vulnerability. These early relational scripts often follow individuals into adulthood, shaping how they express needs, manage conflict, or assert boundaries in friendships, partnerships, and professional settings. For instance, a child who felt responsible for maintaining family peace may grow into an adult who overfunctions emotionally in relationships. Likewise, a sibling who often led family decisions may default into dominant roles in group dynamics. Without awareness and reflection, these patterns can unconsciously reproduce cycles of overcontrol or emotional silencing, even in new environments.
Conscious Power in Everyday Life
Dominance and submission are not inherently sexual; they are about structure, trust, and communication. Recognizing how these dynamics play out in everyday life and choosing how we want to engage with them, can foster more conscious relationships, whether at home, work, or within ourselves. Rather than viewing dominance as control and submission as weakness, we might see them as roles that, when willingly embraced, promote clarity and emotional safety. This understanding of our preferences and communicating openly, can transform power dynamics from unconscious patterns into conscious choices.
References
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 132–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132
Harviainen, J. T., & Frank, K. (2016). Safety and trust in non-ordinary play: BDSM as a risky leisure. Journal of Positive Sexuality, 2(3), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.51681/1.233
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nichols, M. (2006). Psychotherapeutic issues with “kinky” clients: Clinical problems, yours and theirs. Journal of Homosexuality, 50(2-3), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v50n02_14
Post date: 2025.6.6
| Key | Abbreviation Meaning |
|---|---|
| BDSM | Bondage and Discipline, Dominance and Submission, Sadism and Masochism |